httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeTL0tjkYYw
Guy at the front is like, whatevs, good deal.
Thanks Buzzfeed.
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeTL0tjkYYw
Guy at the front is like, whatevs, good deal.
Thanks Buzzfeed.
Man, I have to say that this is some of the most selfless, amazing and genuine goodwill I have ever heard of. This guy dresses up as Batman and visits terminally (or seriously) ill kids in hospitals.
He’s got a Lamborghini kitted out as the Batmobile (until his $250 000 custom made car is ready), has a professionally made Batman suit, the whole deal. He recently got some Internet attention because he got pulled over by the police for not having his regular plates on while in costume, which prompted this article about his reasons for dressing as Batman. This is a pretty classy guy doing some actual good, hard to not get a little misty reading it. Nice job.
A pretty decent article today on OttawaCitizen.com about the relative risks we take all the time, and how some are perceived to be horribly dangerous, while others are perfectly fine.
The article correctly plays risks against each other that make very little sense when taken together. Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) is an enormous sport (albeit one that makes very little sense to me) that is gaining more and more mainstream credibility, while at the same time being really really dangerous to it’s participants, who get injured more or less every time they actually take part in the sport. Take that into contrast with the illegality of marijuana, which as mind altering substances go is almost incredibly safe (essentially impossible to die from ingesting in humans: likely eating about 1500 pounds of the stuff at once ), and safer by far than almost anything found in a medicine, or liquor cabinet (for instance two aspirin is the generally accepted dose, but 40 aspirins will kill 50% of adults). Strangely enough, apparently eating ten raw potatoes can cause a toxic reaction in some people. Do you have your potatoe license? I don’t.
Similarly the article quotes a British researcher on the topic of banning steroids:
 “I would prefer my child take anabolic steroids and growth hormone than play rugby,†a British scientist who studies doping told the Financial Times. “I don’t know of any cases of quadriplegia caused by growth hormone.â€
It puts things into a new perspective, actually.
Read on:
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/opinion/columnists/smoking+dope/6045068/story.html
I have an inspiration, I don’t know his name.
I met his wife today after she swam the lanes.
She spoke of a day years ago on the 11th of November
Until she was on her deathbed, she swore she’d remember.
It was cold and slushy at the Montreal epitaph,
She shook her head as she dressed, and gave a reflective laugh.
I thought it was fitting, given the date today,
And instead of rushing off to swim, I wanted to hear what else she had to say.
So I poked along with fussing with my goggles and cap
Her eyes widened with pride as she said, “My husband swims 100 lapsâ€
I smiled brightly at her and said, ‘Wow that’s a best for meâ€
With her gentle smile she said, “He’s 83â€
“He’s at home today he’s feeling ill,
He had a gallbladder attack, and wants to swim still.â€
I smiled my best smile for her and his praises I spoke
I wished her the best day ever, with a lump in my throat.
With my head filled with food for thought,
I surmised that this man too, in the war fought.
His devoted wife clearly only has eyes for him,
With this little gift I headed to swim.
This little princess swims in a salt water pool
My kids are safe when they go to school
My family is happy, healthy and free
This man contributed to this cause, and I live the benefits, you see.
So think today about the sacrifices made,
Support our soldiers that are currently dodging grenades
For them there was war, there is war, pain and death,
As for the rest of us….Lest we forget.
I’m about to break my own rule of blogging here. I never write about controversial things, I usually take a very very soft touch here, because I find as a rule that if you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all. That usually works really well, and since I rarely have an axe to grind (this one in particular is a notable exception, and look where that got me) things on the blog are rarely all that busy.
So, here’s me breaking this rule by stating that the Catholic Church is doing a lousy job of running itself. I definitely don’t consider myself a “believer” in any way, but it seems to me that if we consider the church as any business they are doing a fine job of alienating their customers. The church wants butts in the seats on Sunday, that’s their measure of success. The more butts in seats they get, the healthier the bottom line is and the more likely the church will be around next year, same as any other business. These days it seems to me that churches are not doing so well, so in any market downturn a business would be wise to keep its existing customers happy, ride out the downturn and hopefully be ready for the next upswing in fortunes. That doesn’t seem to be the case, or at least at my community church. In recent years the church decided to take over the preparations for the first communion rite, which used to be largely done by the schools. The biggest change is the amount of pressure placed on parents to participate in this process. We experienced this for Quinn two years ago, multiple weeknights logging attendance at parent-only sessions, in addition to a couple of weekend afternoons that (at least) included the children receiving the rite. The sessions were long, had little to do with the actual rite of communion, and in fact were mandatory. The extra special sauce was the sessions are run by volunteers from the community who make Dolores Umbridge look downright relaxed. I understand the need to have the process as clear as possible, but come on people, when you are talking to a room full of adults perhaps you could avoid using your teacher voice? If you miss attending a session you risk having your child denied the rite of communion. Wait, what?
This whole process is a strange thing to ask of parents in my mind. I would think that the church would make receiving these rites as painless as possible for everyone involved. The church itself needs people to attend services, I would think that making sure everyone experienced the full service would be a priority. Instead, they have chosen to make this (almost) free, voluntary act as PAINFUL as it can possibly be. They are making it more difficult to become a full member of the church, which is a crazy business plan for a struggling business.
Now we are starting the whole process over again for our third child, and it seems that the sessions contain EXACTLY the same information as they contained two years ago. Right down to the videos made 20 years ago. As any busy parent will tell you, sitting through the same pointless information not once, but TWICE makes a fella kinda stabby. Forget that the parent sessions are held on weeknights, at exactly the best time of the day for snuggling and reading together. So attending these things is actually reducing the amount of quality time I have with my kids. I love that.
The questions that followed the first session cemented what I already suspected: that attendance is mandatory, even for parents of multiple children, and even though parents HAVE NOTHING TO DO with the rite in question. Essentially our job is to make sure our kids colour the book we pay for. Yes, it’s exactly this kind of rigid pointless inflexibility that really endears a business to its customers. Why on earth would they require us to sit through these sessions once, let alone twice? The best part is they essentially hold the actual rite as a sort of hostage so that you will attend. If you don’t show, your kid doesn’t have communion. Yep, that’s how I want to be treated as a customer.
If they make it hard, people won’t come, fewer kids get communion. You can bet that a large percentage of kids that don’t have first communion in grade two will never bother to go back and get it later. Add to that disillusioned parents that just stop going to church because of crap like this, and they are working themselves right out of business. In a few generations they are in really big trouble.
Some footnotes on this: I know nothing about churches, and know nothing about the Catholic church even though my kids are baptized and attend Catholic school. My comments are based on my own observations, and are meant as a helpful critique from what the church should see as a potential customer. If they don’t listen to their customers, my feeling is that in the free market of many other churches and many other religions, they will lose.
Sigh, ok now I have that off my chest. I feel better. Like a confession. Oops.
Here’s a link to a CBC Radio program that has an interview with a childless couple from the downtown neighbourhood of Liberty Village that is trying to get a bylaw passed that would prevent couples from buying a home in the 4 block area immediately surrounding their own home. I wish them luck in their efforts to rid themselves of screaming rugrats.
 Toronto Neighbourhood tries to ban children